The Importance of Being Earnest Essay
Throughout
the play “The Importance of Being Earnest”, Oscar Wilde portrays and disdains
the high- class of the Victorian society through the theme of
self-identification, utilization of irony, a mock-serious tone of
understatement, and condescending characterization throughout the play.
The theme
of self-identification is a recurring theme in the contents of the play. In Act
1, it is discovered that Jack does not know his lineage and creates an alter
identity by the name of Ernest. Also Algernon develops a false individual named
Bunbury to be an excuse for Algernon’s boredom with being in town. Through Jack’s alter ego, Wilde implicitly
depicts the high- class to consist of social-distortion and not retain an
identity, but to simply manifest an identity for self-fulfillment. Jack and
Algernon’s fake manifestation of non-existent individuals are an example of social-distortion
within the high-class of the Victorian Era.
Within all acts irony is often
applied. In Act 1, Jack proposes to Gwendolyn
as Ernest and she states she always wanted to marry someone named Ernest. In
Act 2, Algernon proposes to Cecily as Ernest and she also states she wanted to
marry someone named Ernest. Each Jack and Algernon are nor Ernest nor earnest
and therefore depict a deceiving character which reflects on the high-class as
gullible and untruthful. The proposals of the “Ernest’s” portrayed the
unsophisticated and manipulative side of the high-class individuals. Irony is also portrayed in Act 3 as Jack
discovers his real name is Ernest and is Algernon’s older brother. Jack’s
self-discovery brings a new innovative meaning to the cliché “ignorance is
bliss” to “ignorance is revealing” as Jack’s ignorance revealed Wilde’s depiction
of high-class individuals being blindly perceptive.
A mock-serious tone of understatement
is utilized in several aspects of the play. Though there are minor brotherly
quarrels, Jack and Algernon’s disagreement of a cigarette case in Act 1 and argument
pertaining to muffins in Act 2 is Wilde’s implicit perspective that the
high-class can afford to argue over small, petty matters and reveals a small sense
of greed and materialism. Also in Act 2, Gwendolyn rejects sugar in her tea and
tea cake as it is “not fashionable nowadays”, but Cecily later hands both to
her to create an implied insult. Cecily handing both unwanted goods to Gwendolyn
proved Cecily indirectly defamed Gwendolyn as not fashionable, supporting Wilde’s
perception on wealthy people as concerned with mainstream matters instead of
sophisticated concerns. Minor conflicts can obtain understated implications and
interpretations.
In the play condescending
characterization occurs in Lady Bracknell as she looks down on Jack’s character
and worthiness of being married to her daughter Gwendolyn since Jack does not
know his lineage and was found in a hand bag. Lady Bracknell’s characterization
is a supporting view point in Wilde’s perception of the wealthy that the
wealthy are narrow-minded and intolerant of other social classes especially if
unknown and suspected to be lower- classmen. Lady Bracknell’s character portrayal
is an implication of Wilde’s perspective of the wealthy.
No comments:
Post a Comment